ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the changes in cerebral hemodynamics in different body positions in healthy volunteers.Methods Sixty right-handed healthy male volunteers,aged 22-26,height 167-178 cm,weighing 51-67 kg,were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n =15 each): 15 degrees head-down tilt group (group Ⅰ ),30 degrees head-down tilt group (group Ⅱ ),15 degrees head-up tilt group (group Ⅲ) and 30 degrees head-up tilt group (group Ⅳ ).Blood flow signals of right middle cerebral artery (MCA) and extracranial internal carotid artery (EICA) were detected by transcranial Doppler and systolic blood flow velocity (Vs),diastolic blood flow velocity (Vd ),mean blood flow velocity (Vm),pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) were recorded at supine position (baseline),immediately,10 and 30 min after body position change(T1-3 ).Lindegaard index was calculated.Results Compared with the baseline,in group [Ⅱ Lindegaard index was increased at T2,while Vs and Vm of MCA were decreased at T2,3,in group Ⅳ Vs of MCA and PI of EICA at T2,Vd and Vm of MCA at T2,3 were decreased ( P ＜ 0.05),while there was no significant difference in the variables mentioned above in the other two groups ( P ＞ 0.05 ).Conclusion In healthy adults,cerebral blood flow velocity decreases in 30 degrees headdown and head-up tilt positions,however there is no change in cerebral blood flow velocity in 15 degrees headdown and head-up tilt positions.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study clinical application value of sacral and epidural block in treating lumbar intervertehral disc protrusion (LIDP), and explore technical operation methods, indications and con-traindications of sacral block. Methods Sacral block was adopted in 120 patients with LIDP(sacral group), they were injected triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg, vitamin B1 100 mg, vitamin B12 1 mg, 2% lidocaine 100 mg, added physiological saline 20-30 ml, twice a week, three times as a period. Compared therapy effect with epidural block (120 cases, epidural group). Results The achievement ratio of once puncture was 93.3% (112/120) in sacral group and 82.5% (99/120) in epidural group, P < 0.05. After treatment, the excellent and good rate of sacral group and epidural group were 85.0%(102/120) and 93.3%(112/120), there was not obvious difference, P>0.05, but the fair and bad rate were 15.0%(18/120) and 6.7%(8/120), there was ob-vious difference, P<0.05. Conclusions Sacral block and epidural block are effective methods to treat LIDP. They can relieve the stress at nerve root, especially sacral block, which has the advantages of easily operation, less pain, less side effect and safety.